The Effect of Radec’s Learning Model Assisted by Zoom Application on Science Critical Thinking Ability during Covid-19 Pandemic Era
Keywords:
RADEC Learning Model, Zoom Application, Critical Thinking, Covid-19Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of the RADEC learning model assisted by the zoom application on students' critical thinking skills in the Covid-19 pandemic era. This type of research is a quasi experimental research design type nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all sixth grade students of SD Negeri Sekompleks Kalukuang Makassar City which consisted of 4 schools with a total number of students being 203 and the research sample was 56 students of class VI SDN Kalukuang 1 Makassar with a random sampling technique. Data collection techniques using test techniques, test techniques are used to determine critical thinking skills in the form of 6 item essay questions. The data analysis technique used independent sample t-test analysis. The results of the study based on descriptive analysis show that the average critical thinking skills of the RADEC learning model are 87.14 and the discovery learning learning model reaches 80.21. This means that the RADEC learning model is better than the discopery learning model, while the inferential analysis results show that the RADEC learning model assisted by the zoom cloud meeting application has a significant effect compared to the discovery learning model on critical thinking skills and science learning outcomes of class VI SDN Kalukuang 1 Makassar. . This is based on the independent sample t-test, the Sig (2-tailed) value is 0.000 <0.05. This means that the RADEC learning model is better than the discopery learning model, while the inferential analysis results show that the RADEC learning model assisted by the zoom cloud meeting application has a significant effect compared to the discovery learning model on critical thinking skills and science learning outcomes of class VI SDN Kalukuang 1 Makassar. . This is based on the independent sample t-test, the Sig (2-tailed) value is 0.000 <0.05. This means that the RADEC learning model is better than the discopery learning model, while the inferential analysis results show that the RADEC learning model assisted by the zoom cloud meeting application has a significant effect compared to the discovery learning model on critical thinking skills and science learning outcomes of class VI SDN Kalukuang 1 Makassar. . This is based on the independent sample t-test, the Sig (2-tailed) value is 0.000 <0.05.
Downloads
References
Adi Pratama, Y., Sopandi, W., & Hidayah, Y. (2019). Radec Learning Model (Read-Answer-Discuss-Explain And Create): The Importance of Building Critical Thinking Skills in Indonesian Context. Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijolec.v2i1.99
Agustin, M. (2011). Learning Problems and Learning Innovations Guide for Teachers, Counselors, Psychologists, Parents, and Education Personnel. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Ennis, RH (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions. 1–8. Retrieved from https://education.illinois.edu/docs/defau lt-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/thenatureofcriticalthinking_51711
_000.pdf
Handayani1, H., Sopandi, W., Syaodih, E., Setiawan, D., & Suhendra, I. (2019). The Impact of the Treatment of the RADEC Learning Model for Prospective Teachers on the Ability to Plan Lessons in Elementary Schools. IV, 79–93.
Hanum, L., Istikomah, DA, & Jana, P. (2019). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (Pbl) and Discovery Learning (Dl) Learning Models in terms of Problem Solving Ability. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v8i1.32 03
Mustusilo, EY (2019). PISA Score 2018: Complete Ranking of Student Science in 78 Countries, This is Indonesia's Position.
Husnah, M. (2017). The Relationship between Critical Thinking Levels on Students' Physics Learning Outcomes by Applying Problem Based Learning Models. Physics and Science Learning (PASCAL), 01, 10–17. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/PASC AL/article/view/338/352
Khaeruddin, Amin, BD, & Jasrudin. (2013). Analysis of critical thinking skills in the 2013 Curriculum Basic Competencies for High School Physics Subjects. Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills in the Basic Competencies of the 2013 Curriculum for High School Physics Subjects, p. 179.
Nugroho, RA (2018). HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills: Concepts, Learning, Assessment, and Questions). PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Patrick, G., & Esther, C. (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. In Assessment and Teaching of 21st
Century Skills (pp. 293–310). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_15
Sopandi, W. (2019). Dissemination and Implementation Workshop of RADEC Learning Models for Primary and Secondary Education Teachers [Dissemination and Implementation Workshop of RADEC Learning Models for Primary and Secondary Education Teachers]. PEDAGOGIA: Journal of Education, 8(1), 19.
https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i1
.1853
Triling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). Century Skills. In 21st Century Skills. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
Zamroni & Mahfudz. (2009). Learning Technical Guide That Develops Critical Thinking. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Zandvakili, E., Washington, E., Gordon, E., & Wells, C. (2018). Mastery Learning in the Classroom: Concept Maps, Critical Thinking, Collaborative Assessment (M3CA) Using Multiple Choice Items (MCIs). Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 45.
