Rubrik Penilaian Kinerja pada Pembelajaran STEM Berbasis Keterampilan 4C

Authors

  • Italyani Nurhaifa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Tasikmalaya Author
  • Ghullam Hamdu Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Tasikmalaya Author
  • Yusuf Suryana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Tasikmalaya Author

Keywords:

Rubric, Performance Assesment, 4C Skills

Abstract

Curriculum 2013 implements authentic assessment and requires students to have 21st century skills. STEM learning supports the 2013 curriculum. Authentic assessment can be used with performance assessments using rubrics. This reseacrh aims to develop 4C-based performance assessment rubric on STEM learning in primary schools that is valid and practical as an assessment tool. In general, this research is development of performance rubric. Qualitative research based on focus group discussions (FGD) consists of seven stages: 1) identifying the objectives of the research object; 2) identify the question/ problem of the research object; 3) identify participants; 4) choose the time, location FGD process; 5) conducting FGD; 6) evaluating data; and 7) reporting data. The participants are samples that have the same interest in the topic/object of research. Rubric is a performance tool using certain criteria in assessing learning activities. The results of the study are, 1) an assessment instrument in the form of a learning performance rubric based on STEM 4C; 2) STEM learning performance assessment rubric consists of individual and group performance evaluation rubric; 3) performance rubric based on expert validation is declared as suitable as an assessment tool; 4) based on FGD it produces a valid and reliable product performance evaluation rubric. The results is the performance rubric instrument in the form of rubric is said to be valid and reliable as a form of assessment tools. Rubric 4C skills on STEM-based learning developed by researchers can be used by teachers in conducting an objective assessment based on criteria and indicators. In addition, students will have a reference about what is expected by the teacher based on the assessment rubric. Thus students can show their best performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Glynn P, Shanahan M and Duggan D. (2015). Focus Groups. Available form: https://www.slideshare.net/johnglynn94 0/focus-groups-presentation [Diakses: 01 Mei 2020]

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (Vol. 9789400723).

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

Hamdu, G., & Suryani, I. (2019). The Analysis of Rubric Feasibility Using Video Snippets of Learning Process. 6(2), 239–252.

https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i2.14150

Indrizal, E. (2016). DISKUSI KELOMPOK

TERARAH Focus Group Discussion (FGD) (Prinsip-Prinsip dan Langkah Pelaksanaan Lapangan). FISIP Universitas Andalas, Padang, 75–82.

Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI. (2013). Permendikbud No 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2011, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2009.1 0.012

Metin, M. (2013). Teacher’s Difficulties in Preparation and Implementation of Performance Task. Educational Sciences:Theory&Practice. 13

[3].1664-1673

DOI:10.12738/estp.2013.3.1452

Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox : Enhancing Student Learning

through Online Faculty Development. 1(1).

Muslich, M. (2011). Authentic Assesment: Penilaian Berbasis Kelas dan Kompetensi. Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama.

Musnidar, L. (2018). PENGARUH PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN STEM ( SCIENCE , TECHNOLOGY , ENGINEERING , MATHEMATICS ) TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN CREATIF PROBLEM SOLVING DAN

KOMUNIKASI SISWA Lia Musnidar. Prosiding SEMNAS MIPA IV, 174–179.

Oktaviani, I. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Pada Pembelajaran Outdoor Permainan Tradisional Berbasis STEM di Sekolah dasar. (Skripsi). Tasikmalaya: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Tasikmalaya.

Omar, D. (2018). Focus group discussion in built environment qualitative research practice. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 117(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/117/1/012050

Permanasari, A. (2016). STEM Education : Inovasi dalam Pembelajaran Sains. 23–34.

Rosdiana, T., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Studi Implementasi Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013.

Jakarta:Puspendik, Balitbang Kemendikbud.

Rubrics, C., & Resources, A. (2014). 4Cs RUBRICS : Additional Resources. 1–18.

Wulan, A. R. (2018). Menggunakan Penilaian Kinerja untuk Pembelajaran Sains dan Penelitian. Bandung: UPI Press.

Zulfikar, D. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja pada Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM untuk Mencapai Kemampuan 4C di Sekolah Dasar. (Skripsi). Tasikmalaya: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Tasikmalaya.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-14

How to Cite

Rubrik Penilaian Kinerja pada Pembelajaran STEM Berbasis Keterampilan 4C. (2020). Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 4(1), 101-110. https://ejournal-tasikmalaya.upi.edu/ijpe/article/view/222